Here it is the object of infinity and is in the case objective. Robber agrees with him in the objective case. 1. If a sentence contains two verbal predicates that both settle the same case, concordance is not a problem: a nominative predicatsu used with a finite verb is in case of nominative. Correspondence on the basis of grammatical number can occur between the verb and the subject, as in the case of the grammatical person discussed above. In fact, the two categories are often mixed within verbal patterns: there are specific verbs for the first person singular, the second person plural and so on. Some examples: Also note the concordance that is shown to be even in the subjunctive atmosphere. Modern English is not very consistent, although it exists. The subject of an infinititive is in the objective case: I knew he was the thief. In the case of verbs, gender conformity is less prevalent, although it may still occur. For example, in the past French compound, in certain circumstances, the past part corresponds to the subject or an object (see past compound for details). In Russian and most other Slavic languages, the form of the past in sex corresponds to the subject.
(c) For adjectives, each case can be used, regardless of the link verb. Instrumental is however characteristic of literary and nominative language – of conversation: compared to English, Latin is an example of a very volatile language. The consequences for concordance are: a rare type of chord that copies parts of the head phonologically instead of corresponding to a grammatical category.  For example, in Bainouk: for example, in standard English, we can say that I am or that he is, but not « I am » or « he is ». This is because the grammar of language requires that the verb and its subject correspond personally. The pronouns I and him are the first or third person respectively, just as the verb forms are and are. The verb must be chosen in such a way as to have the same person as the subject, unlike the fictitious agreement based on meaning.   For example, in American English, the un expression is treated as a singular for the purposes of the agreement, although it is formally plural. Children`s use of case and concordance morphology provides insight into the structure of their developing grammatical systems. Children who acquire English often produce accusative pronouns in the subject position and use verb forms without correspondence morphology. The systematic patterns of these errors and the correlations between them have been the subject of much research in recent decades. This chapter presents some of the results obtained so far and the theoretical interpretations that have led to them, as well as points of the methodological debate.
The discussion focuses on English, taking into account other languages in which predictions differ, and themes include an overview of the relationship between case and chord, optional infinitives/roots, standard case, and morphological access. The noun or pronoun that follows an opaque verb and means the same person or thing as the subject, as in the sentences above, corresponds to the subject. In Norway, Nynorsk, Sweden, Iceland and the Faroe, past participation must correspond to gender, number and determination when participation is in an attributive or predictive position. In Iceland and the Faroe Islands, past participations should also correspond in the grammatical case. (b) The instrumental case is normally used with nouns according to the following link verbs: звать – call, name; зваться – to be called; называться – to be called; стать – become; являться – to be, to appear; казаться – seem, etc. . . .